Monday, 16 February 2015

Neighbourly co-operation

GreenhouseI just came across this concise news post (from October 2013) which I felt was well-worth sharing, from Whissendine in Rutland:

'In one sunny day, A gave B a blueberry bush, B gave A some alchemilla mollis, D used his 4x4 to pull out a shrub then B and E helped move D's greenhouse from his garden, via the gardens of B and A. Good neighbour co-operation?'

 

 

16 Feb 2015 13:35:06 | Neighbourhood relations

2 Comments

Cooperation - yes? But neighbourliness? Alchmella mollis? No thanks, spreads everywhere and is a pest to get rid of. Reckon B did all right though!

Posted by: Martin Dudley | Monday, 16 February 2015 at 14:22

Ah well, you know about these things. I thought it was a failed anagram for 'I smell a local llama'.

Posted by: Kevin Harris | Monday, 16 February 2015 at 14:27

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Experience of community researchers using iPads This week, with my colleague Alison Gilchrist, I had the privilege of spending time reflecting with a group of community researchers on their experience of carrying out survey interviews with local people. We’d asked them (and provided training and support of course) to administer questionnaires using Survey Gizmo on iPads, in the field, across three adjacent neighbourhoods. The session was full of insights and we’ll try to capture these systematically in due course. Here I just want to mention those which to us were the most striking. First, there were a couple of technical glitches as the iPad version of Survey Gizmo was not quite stable: these might thoroughly have dispirited most people, but our intrepid researchers overcame them in one way or another. Secondly, they faced and overcame resistance and rejection from some residents (with suggestions of racism, sexism and anti-student sentiment in one case) to meet the overall target and not be far off the sampling targets. Thirdly, we were hugely impressed at the level of collaboration between them, as they supported and encouraged one another in recruiting respondents. There were a couple of other lessons that we might have anticipated on beforehand, but hadn’t. To begin with, the time of year makes a significant difference: it can be really hard trying to find respondents and arrange appointments in winter when it starts getting dark at 3.30 in the afternoon. Our researchers felt they would be happy to do such an exercise again, but it would need to be spring or summer. What’s more, using iPads with automatic upload of completed data may be great from the overall research point of view, but from the interviewer’s point of view it means they’re strictly limited to one respondent at a time. If you have hard copy questionnaires that can be self-completed at least partially, you can work with a group of several when you catch them – perhaps as they emerge from a community centre event or are quiet-timing in the library. Some of our researchers were happy to do this and to accept the additional time required to key-in the responses. (And in the circumstances, as it happens, I’m comparatively relaxed about the risk of keying errors, although in other circumstances that would be a consideration). My last thought here is to reflect on the youngest of the group - who had struggled with one or two inconsiderate intermediaries, a number of failed appointments and other difficulties – telling us how she had most success in the local park at the weekend, when dog-walkers with unpressured time were willing to sit on a bench or even walk along, tapping at the iPad, just so that we could get our precious data.
PREVIOUS POST
Civic activism toolkit Here’s a curate’s egg for yer. In Northern Ireland the Building Change Trust has just published what it calls a grassroots democracy toolkit for civil society. There’s lots to like. I was immediately impressed by the structure and design of the site: it neither overwhelms me with choice and information, nor feels stingy or shallow in what it is revealing. That’s a smart piece of design. Against that, there’s surely not much excuse for the peculiar masculine bias and old-fashioned total whiteness of faces in the graphics. More than 5 out of ten for sure, but a pity.

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments