Few people will pay much attention to a piece of master’s research on neighbourly interactions with just 22 survey respondents and nine interviews. You’re not going to get headline quantitative findings.
But what you sometimes get – as here in work by Connie Lussier on ‘factors affecting neighbourliness’ in a neighbourhood in Edmonton Alberta - is a little unassuming granularity, because the author has let people’s voices through. Like this for instance:
Irene says that she shovels half the neighbour’s walk if she is out first, and the neighbour does half hers if he is out first “and it’s such a nice thing… because I feel guilty if I haven’t done my sidewalk before I go to work.”
This is described as an urban neighbourhood and it doesn’t sound unusual. Most of the residents ‘tend to be acquainted with just one or two immediate neighbours’ and ‘do not appear to know the neighbours further down the street’. Nor do they seem worked up about that.
Lussier explores factors affecting frequency of neighbouring, and comes up with this diagram.
I don’t mind that it’s rather ungainly, what struck me was that she gives a degree of significance to ‘personality’ and ‘social skills’, which is very rare in my experience. The point is not developed in the thesis. But it reminds me that most of the literature on neighbouring (and all of the policy attempts to increase it) simply treats us as if we are all equally sociable and outgoing in our personalities.
Recent Comments