Monday, 05 July 2010

Local sites and civic involvement

KH with Steve Clift at Edelman Jul 10 Last Friday Hugh Flouch and I organised a Networked Neighbourhoods roundtable discussion on civic involvement and local online in London. We took advantage of the presence in town of US e-democracy pioneer Steven Clift to bring a few interesting people together for some easy-going discussion and share some early findings from our London study.

Unaware that I was about to be knocked back by a short bout of flu (as I type this, coincidentally and characteristically, here's the Next-Door-Neighbour at the back-door asking am I better) there was even less chance that I might come up with any particular insights at the time; but it was at least a moment to try and relate local websites to the community organising and civic involvement expectations of Big Society.

Among the points I hope I managed to put across were these:

  • The transformations to co-production of local quality of life and to a more conversational democracy are not trivial, but they are both within the legitimate aspirations of neighbourhood online networks.
  • When we look at these sites and the effects they appear to be having, I don’t think we should be looking necessarily for effects that shore up the old ways of doing representative democracy. Nor should we be looking for the strengthening of strong ties and the creation of close-knit communities: local sites support fluid, overlapping networks of weak ties that incorporate sufficient trust to get things done.
  • Those ways of getting things done might extend to Alinsky-style community organising, but you wouldn’t conclude from our material that the link is strong. I think it’s fairer to say that we can see a latent demand for informal, controlled-commitment involvement in local issues – people are creating as well as responding to local opportunities, online.
  • These sites are places that accommodate the unclubbable alongside the clubbable. We’ve yet to appreciate the benefit of that.
  • Essentially, these sites change the acoustics of the public realm: the voices of local people are increasingly audible, not because a few people shout louder but because conversations are generated, accumulate, and are transparent.

The pic of myself and Steve Clift was taken by Hugh and I rather like the reflected cycles round our heads.

There's a short report on the session on the Networked Neighbourhoods site here.

5 Jul 2010 18:49:16 | Governance and participation, Information and communication, networked neighbourhoods

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Kids will climb A couple of lads had climbed up onto the roof of the bus shelter on the main road. They were about ten, maybe 12 years old at most. I realised as I passed that my mind had done those little assessments - are they safe? will it break? can they get down? - and moved on. A moment later behind me, 'Get down, you vandals! Get off there!' - a voice in a suit. They scrammed, hopefully not accruing too much more resentment about the ridiculous intolerance of adults.
PREVIOUS POST
'50 Ways to Meet Your Neighbour' Last night to a somewhat exploratory Big Society event - as Tim Davies has noted, 'a rather chaotic open space event packed into a small space in the DCLG offices' (pic by Paul Clarke). Lots of ideas spilling out, some specific, many at a high level of generality as we all experiment with this new syntax of not-quite-policy. Even I was surprised at some of the determined theoretical pondering and the persistence of conceptual bullet-pointing. I've been told I could conceptualise for Britain; but for once I came over all practical. Perhaps it was just that I'm still creaky and wembly from the weekend's flu-blast, perhaps partly it was the reassuring first half of Paul Twivy's introductory speech (the second drifted into social enterprise land and I lost the path, no matter). First, a general point. About five years ago there were some evangelical jamboree-style events around the new Labour notion of 'Together We Can'. They were characterised by a refreshing if puzzling sense of welcome suddenly offered to the community sector, without any relinquishing of the agenda by the centre. I was struck last night by the comparison. The language and issues have not really changed: the style, however, couldn't be much different. Whereas TWC events were anti-septic, anti-sceptic, and highly-orchestrated, last night's open session - albeit inevitably dominated by the London twitterati - was fluid, confusing, creative - and consciously, almost riskily, under-managed. I stood in a corner with Roxanne Persaud and Nick Buckley for a conversation about how neighbouring is a fundamental ingredient of Big Society, given the principles of local connection and involvement in issues of common interest. I asked how we overcome the shyness/privacy barriers that constrain people from making those initial connections that result in neighbourly behaviour. We seem to need more devices like street parties and clean-ups that will just get folk started; and I argue that for neighbouring to work, we don't need much more than basic recognition (but we do need fewer cars on our pavements). The forthcoming Gumtree research (to be launched next week, trailed here) makes the point that shyness is a big barrier and people don't like to impose themselves. Can Big Society help us raise awareness large-scale, and bring the inhibition bar down a notch or two? Nick came up with the phrase '50 Ways to Meet Your Neighbour' and we kicked things off with the first few... pavement freecycling, bench in the front garden, communal wheelie bins etc. And this from Roxanne - networked multi-user games in temporary public wifi spaces. Working on the idea later today.

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments