Wednesday, 23 December 2009

Ho ho ho

In a Connected Communities newsletter, the RSA has announced that it is working on the “RSA Civic Certificate" -

'We are in the process of designing a new community development qualification with the aim of recognising, encouraging and supporting civic action.'

This'll look good in the field - an imperiously-bestowed qualification emanating from a London-based organisation made up of wealthy well-intentioned professionals, with the word ‘Royal' in its name, and one hell of a track record in community development. How have we coped without it all these years?

I could be wrong, but I reckon the anti-professional ethos of CD practice should just about remain intact.

23 Dec 2009 21:09:17

2 Comments

Well, as a member (umm, Fellow as they call it) of the RSA I couldn't possibly comment, but you could pop over and offer some down-to-earth insights on why people do good things for others here. Apparently we are reciprocal altruists. Anyway, I have to declare an interest that I hope to be doing some work with the RSA's Citizens of the Future project in Peterborough, seeing what social media can bring to the mix in a kindof non-pro way.

Posted by: David Wilcox | Thursday, 24 December 2009 at 10:01

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Pause, look back, reflect Julian Dobson uses a handy live metaphor, a 404 on the community empowerment action plan, to illustrate the fickleness of priorities in government policy. He points to the amount of energy that gets put into whatever is the current Big Idea until it moves into the 'file and forget' phase. I was told at the time of the empowerment white paper that more than 100 officials were working on it, suggesting a CLG equivalent of Parkinson's law, that work consumes the time of as many people as can be made available for it. Julian notes that: 'This form of leadership, sadly, appears ingrained in our political system,' and goes on to link the syndrome to international political failure in Copenhagen. To be fair, the CLG website is a large and very fluid organism and I hope we can forgive the occasional 404. I hope we can also recognise that not all politicians have been slow to respond to climate change and not all can be blamed for the failure of the summit. But the connection between transitory, even capricious, attitudes to policy and critical failures of leadership is wholly valid. I'd like to add that it's part of a wider culture which may or may not be fuelled by government attitudes. This culture includes over-emphasis on novelty and innovation; reluctance to refer to the past of more than a few months, in case it tells us things we don't want to know; and systematic dismissal of the experience of older people. It also encompasses the cultural devaluation of loyalty. Sports celebrities aren't expected to show loyalty to their teams; nor employers to their employees or vice versa; nor teachers to their schools, nor consumers to their brands. Nor families to each other. Nor, as Julian's post reminds us, do governments seem concerned to remain loyal to their policies. Only people of faith seem to be exceptions to this rule. If young people are supposed to inherit values from the adult world, this does not bode well. This phenomenon plays out in a curious way in our hurried public language, nowadays saturated with Important Verbs. Take this for example from Steph Gray's Helpful technology blog, coralling verbs from various government departments: At the FCO, it’s Listen, Publish, Engage, Evaluate. In the DIUS of Justin Kerr-Stevens, it was Educate, Enable, Engage, Promote. For Steph, it's listening, explaining, engaging, convening. Others commenting think 'connect' and 'collaborate' should be in there. I've played this game meself in suggesting a model for participative evaluation (Listen, Interpret, Play back, Listen, Interpret, Report). And so it goes on. A few weeks ago DCMS published a widely-condemned document called Empower, Inform, Enrich - of which Rachel Cooke wrote 'sounds like a scented candle'. Why are we all doing this? I suspect the media and politics engine driving this culture can't stop itself accelerating and we're at risk of losing the habit of reflection. I'm not sure I want to be on board. (Just a quick observation, feel free...
PREVIOUS POST
Neighbourhood encounter A friend told me she was out for a run the other day and saw someone she knew also running. Waited for him, greeted, and was told 'Sorry, I'm a solitary runner'. And on he went. She noticed he had his ears stuffed with, what are they, earpieces of some kind, music let's suppose. The next evening he phoned to apologise for seeming rude. This was someone who would be classed as an acquaintance, neither friend nor stranger. I'll be posting a review here shortly of a book about acquaintances, by David Morgan.

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments