Friday, 17 July 2009

Local events and community cohesion

Wellcome picnic 2 I've been sifting the material I gathered from participants at the Wellcome community picnic last month. Report to follow. With the Big Lunch taking place this weekend, here's one remark which impressed me:

"For whatever reason, people don’t tend to be very engaged. There are very few activities that bring people together from different backgrounds and you’ll find people from similar backgrounds tend to stay within those social groupings. So this kind of event is fantastic because what it does, it brings people out into a very safe place where they can engage with other people who they wouldn’t necessarily normally associate with or have much connection to, and I think today’s been really, really successful. I was surprised, there’s a lot more people than I thought would come."

17 Jul 2009 17:56:06 | Cohesion and diversity, Neighbourhood relations, Social capital

1 Comment

Did you listen to this year's Reith Lectures, particularly the final one?

They can still be heard on i player for BBC R4 and the transcripts are also available on the BBC R4 web site.

More info on our blog

www.actionforplanningtransparency.blogspot.com/

PS Thanks for picking up (May 18th?) on the question I posed on the planning web page re fantasy sustainable communities.

Posted by: Catherine Stafford | Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 16:08

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Community development and professionalism: time's up Cometh the hour. There I was yesterday mumbling ineffectually about the need to defend the once-essential anti-professional ethos of community development; and today politely trying to field yet another earnest enquiry about whether my old organisation, Community Development Foundation, still has anything to do with community development. Meanwhile here's Jon Fitzmaurice of Self-help-housing.org on the Guardian's Joe Public today: Self-help housing enables people to be active citizens, and it fights the culture of "someone should do something about that". It was once more common, but over the last two decades community development and regeneration has fallen into the hands of professionals preoccupied with management and measurement. Yes, I saw it happening. And yes, I did protest - too weakly, or too forcefully? I don't know, but either way, CD will be reinvented from the bottom-up by people like Jon Fitzmaurice. Let's hope the others just get out of the way.
PREVIOUS POST
Social exclusion across the life course The Social Exclusion Task Force in the Cabinet Office has published some important material from its work on 'Understanding the Risks of Social Exclusion Across the Life Course'. It includes significant new emphasis on people of working age without dependent children. In terms of their perceived detachment from neighbourhood life, it's an important group to know more about. I have two thoughts about the key findings (listed below). (i) What do they show that was not found in the Social Exclusion Unit's initial studies in 1998-2000, and the work of John Hills and co. at the Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion over the years? (ii) By way of partial answer, the most interesting key findings are the last two, because they refer to older people, consistently overlooked in the policy effort over the past ten years. Among the risk markers identified for older people were those 'who had very infrequent contact with others, low social support, and felt that they don’t belong in the area where they lived.' There's some emphasis on the social impact of becoming widowed, although my recollection from research a few years ago is that it's a negative impact for men, but tends to be positive for women (Perren et al 2004). These findings point again to the simmering question of quite when policy will get hold of the issue of informal social care and start to do something about it. Given the difficulty I had in getting the ageing agencies interested in neighbouring I'm not sure where the impetus is going to come from. Key findings from the research There are a small number of families who experience persistent and chronic social exclusion – the study suggests 4% to 7%. (Some sleight of pen here - I agree it's a small percentage: but it's not a small number). Families experiencing complex problems were more likely to be lone parent families, have four or more children, have a younger mother, have a mother from a Black ethnic group, live in rented accommodation and in the most deprived areas. Higher self esteem in adolescence is a protective factor against disadvantage in young adulthood. The proportion of young people most at risk of exclusion fell from 21% to 16% over the period 2001/02 to 2005/06. Events such as becoming employed and finding a partner reduce the risk of falling into social exclusion. The research highlights the importance of responding to the needs of working age adults without dependent children. Working age adults without dependent children who are older, unemployed or inactive, living alone, have few educational qualifications, and are renting their homes have a higher risk of exclusion. Around 5% of older people had multiple risk markers of social exclusion, including poor access to services and transport, physically inactivity, fear of their local area after dark, low social support, and poor general and emotional health. Older people in this group were likely to be aged 80 and older, have no qualifications, and live alone. Good health...

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments