Wednesday, 11 June 2008

Well-being and empowerment (updated)

This morning I interviewed someone who's been trying to implement a community engagement approach in her role helping to provide a local public service.

Nbhd_1007 Sometimes it's hard to appreciate the gulf between the harried and hassled local practitioner, constantly adjusting to change, and the policy context beyond. Through a project I was involved in, a few months ago she suddenly appreciated that the thrust of government policy was in the same direction. Knowing this, my correspondent felt hugely empowered and given confidence to be more assertive in her organisation, thereby accelerating a change of attitude towards citizens.

Here's something else that will make just that sort of contribution. The Young Foundation's local well-being project, working with IDeA and the LSE, has published a report on practical empowerment initiatives in neighbourhoods, called Neighbourliness + empowerment = wellbeing: is there a formula for happy communities?

It argues that the right kind of work on 'neighbourhood and community empowerment' is likely to increase wellbeing in three key dimensions -

  • By providing greater opportunities for residents to influence decisions affecting their neighbourhoods
  • By facilitating regular contact between neighbours
  • By helping residents gain the confidence to exercise control over local circumstances.

What the report seems to do really well is to distil some wishy-washy key contemporary social issues into focused practical points, and this paper looks like it could really give momentum to the efforts of local practitioners and local politicians who have been grappling with (or perhaps avoiding) All That Stuff about social capital, well-being, neighbourliness, involvement, democracy, responsibilisation and so on.

The report puts forward several case studies of empowerment 'done well' (from Manchester, South Tyneside and Hertfordshire) stressing the significance of the balance of control. Yup, it all comes down to mature understandings of the power issues.

But it's also the case that this is an institutional perspective on the issues - this comes across as an impressively crafted practical guide for local officers on trying to stimulate a greater sense of well-being at local level. I think we still need more work to bring local people's experience of such initiatives, and of initiatives they establish and run themselves, to the surface.

Postscript... Two other thoughts about the report.

It seems to have little to do with neighbourliness, which hardly gets mentioned because the scale of the activities and schemes described is well beyond what is likely to be most people's mental map of neighbourly interactions. Perhaps that's understandable from the practitioners' point of view: so is this another example of the appeal of the N word brought on by the exhaustion of the C word?

Much of what is described is good ol' fashioned community development, and the document marks the continued tension between that field of established practice and the trend to take bits of it and call it something else - which again might be fine, so long as the lessons and principles of community development are appreciated and taken into account.

11 Jun 2008 15:18:14 | Citizenship and democracy, Governance and participation, Social capital, Social policy

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
'Overheard a conversation' Informality and conversation are recurring themes of interest to me, and the recent Local Living Library sessions have given plenty of angles for thinking about them. I'm just going through some of the evaluation material, and came across this response from someone who 'borrowed' a recovering alcholic for a conversation, and with some insight described living library as 'a very good idea to build relationships, to see behind one's prejudices or assumptions.' The response to the question 'How did you find out about living library?' was: Overheard a conversation. The evaluation report, which I'm preparing with my colleague Linda Constable, should be ready late summer.
PREVIOUS POST
We still haven't got the hang of democracy Let me see if I have this right. The elected leaders of 27 European nations, supported by an army of advisers and officials, developed a binding constitutional text called the Lisbon Treaty. To emphasise its undoubted importance, and/or because they were so confident that it would be accepted, they included a condition to the effect that if any of the nations rejected it, it was no longer valid. So one nation rejects it, and they're thrown into confusion. How bright is that? Of course, to some extent that precisely represents the problem. Highly-assertive leadership struggles to entertain the possibility of other views - in this case almost to the extent of denial. The Irish 'no' vote also illustrates some of the things that are problematic about referenda, such as over-simplification of complex issues and decision-making-without-responsibility. So is the referendum thought to constitute a valid reaction against responsibility-without-accountability? You takes your choice. One comment here calls for a parallel survey: 'the most important question is whether they would consider themselves competent to decide on the treaty's future.' Modern democracy feels very tender and undeveloped. Many of us still experience democracy as something occasional that intrudes into our lives from time to time, rather than something which permeates everyday life. Did you have a democratic childhood? Did you experience democratic processes at home and at school? Is your workplace democratic, do the agencies in your neighbourhood engage with you to help you influence their practice? Forget about democratic 'traditions', we've only just started. In my experience, when you engage with people on the issues that affect their lives, they quickly see and respect a role for elected representatives and the expertise of their officers. The more people understand this relationship by coming into contact with it, the less difficulty it causes. But we still shove young people through an educational upbringing which tells them almost nothing about local government or the principles of governance. How bright is that? The over-reaction to the perceived crisis of democracy is to over-emphasise countable processes, like voting, when perhaps we need to be putting far more effort into engagement and the understanding of conversational democracy, creating a society which constantly feels democratic and in which people expect to be engaged.

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments