Wednesday, 25 June 2008

If we had been consulted

If your council decides to remove an identifiable component of your neighbourhood and give it to someone else, without consulting you, how do you respond?

Lamppostman Victorian-style cast-iron street lamp columns in St Andrews, Bristol, the Beeb reports, were being replaced with more efficient, modern ones. The originals apparently were being refurbished to 'enhance the heritage' of conservation areas elsewhere in the city.

David Cemlyn, 66, chained himself to one of the posts and decided hunger strike was called for, saying:

Isn't it strange you have to chain yourself to a lamppost at seven in the morning to get the council to talk to you?

This corporate approach seems not to be unique to Bristol - something similar happened recently in Ealing, where one resident said:

They know full well if we had been consulted there would have been an outcry.

In Bristol, as I understand it, the issue has been resolved and hopefully Mr Cemlyn is eating again contentedly, job done.

But I'm curious. How much does it take just to ask people? Does this sort of thing suggest deliberate surreptitious attempts by authorities to change people's neighbourhoods without them noticing? Is it a question perhaps of insufficient funding in the 'consultation' budget, or dogged compartmentalised blinkeredness on the part of staff? Or are the officials perhaps genuinely puzzled that anybody's interested?

In Bristol, there's a faulty light reporting system but it's not the same thing is it?

25 Jun 2008 19:18:23 | Governance and participation

1 Comment

The same thing happened in Melksham in Wiltshire, but there the county council removed the lamp under cover of a refurbishment and then it 'couldn't be found' again.

Posted by: ian | Thursday, 26 June 2008 at 13:59

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Community engagement by treasure hunt Where would you find a mouse in the library? Not a difficult question, but as part of a treasure hunt I organised yesterday in Manningham, it got people interested and finding out about the proposals for the new library building. I love going to Bradford and I’ve been lucky enough to be asked to help out with consultation in Manningham lately in relation to proposed library renovations. For this occasion I designed a treasure hunt augmented with some SMS consultation to create interest. A Thumbprint site has just been set up - thanks to Andrew Wilson at Blink. For the treasure hunt I used the playful eBook technology developed by Giles Lane and his colleagues at Diffusion. These are digitally generated handbooks which, among other things, are ideal for jotting things down as you move about. Visitors were given an eBook with the first clue printed on the first page. At the location of the answer to that clue, the next clue was to be found in the form of a peel-off label, which was stuck (‘Clue 2’ etc) on the next page. There were eight clues, several of them designed to require some consultation of the plans (‘Where will the toilets be in the new library?’)... This usually necessitated a conversation with the architect, who was present; as well as reference to the history, place and role of the existing building. In addition to the clues, we used the eBooks to ask consultation questions. For example, Clue 4 required people to consult the plans where they would discover that a ‘community garden’ is proposed. We then asked them: What sort of garden would you like to see beside the new building? (A peace garden, a herb garden, a rose garden, or something else?) We encouraged people to hunt in pairs, where possible of different generations. In a couple of cases whole families went round, learning and discussing as they went. Language difficulties meant that we didn’t always get much written content, but what we did capture is valuable and augmented by plenty of conversations. Either by talking with staff or through a checklist on the eBook, residents had the chance to express interest in influencing a range of decisions to be taken as the project develops. This approach meant that the exercise hit some important objectives for us: it was intergenerational multicultural conversational informative created opportunities for volunteering, and fun. A key advantage of the treasure hunt was that it avoided those inactive ‘pools’ and conceptual congestion that you can get, where people stand around repeating the same points based on their own advance agenda. We have tried in the consultation exercises so far to be clear about what is negotiable and what is not, to avoid the risk that people get frustrated asking for something that is not on offer for whatever reason. Another point is to see it more in terms of engagement than consultation. The exercise was only partially about the latter and we hold no...
PREVIOUS POST
A dangerous group There's more here about the trend in official removal of neighbourhood assets, in an article by Finlo Rohrer. My attention was drawn to this observation: Councillors now know to be wary of a dangerous group - the early retirement activists with burgeoning web skills.

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments