So former Attorney General Lord Goldsmith has called for children to pledge an oath of allegiance to the queen, as part of a review of citizenship carried out at the request of the Prime Minister.
And he gets a well-earned round of derision. Simon Jenkins, for instance, points out that the man's paternalism
has nothing whatsoever to do with the civic space in which ordinary Britons live, breathe and conduct their politics, which is based on neighbourhood, community, village, town and city.
There's no need to rehearse the critique here - hopefully this folly will drown quickly and silently.
But there's another question to be asked, which is why a lord of the realm (is that the way to refer to them?) was invited by a Labour prime minister to carry out such an exercise? Why not a panel for example, including several citizens and those who work among citizens? It might have saved some embarassment, but the likelihood that it probably didn't occur to anyone close to the PM is as scary as what Goldsmith came up with.
Recent Comments