Monday, 28 January 2008

Rule of thumb about word of mouth

I was talking to a group of community workers today, getting their views on the use of community centres and ways of getting people through the door. Most of the way through a 12 month funded programme, they told of an influx of new people coming in. This is in an area of low expectations and high needs.

The explanation is that 'word-of-mouth takes 8-9 months...'

'It's about people having the courage to act on what they're hearing. It can take you a year to get confidence in the community, that there's something new for them to try and to trust it. It takes time for the confidence to work through.'

Having spoken to quite a few of the residents about their levels of confidence before and after contact with the centres, this makes sense to me. Funders please note.

28 Jan 2008 20:44:49 | Social capital, Social exclusion

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Video, stream Nick Booth over on Podnosh has done a set of short videos about neighbourhood action in various urban areas, for a recent international conference. I liked this story of how residents in Bordesley Green, Birmingham, dealt with a stinking stream running through their neighbourhood. It turned out that some dubious plumbers working on housing extensions had been connecting the sewerage into the surface water drainage. Reps from the Neighbourhood Forum went with the water company to explain the issues to the homeowners, and got it sorted.
PREVIOUS POST
What makes a good childhood? The Children's Society has set up an inquiry into what makes a good childhood and is collecting 'cherished early memories' in order to build a picture of what a good childhood should look like. We are gathering hundreds and thousands of childhood memories... This will help us understand how to make childhood better today. The memories exercise is likely to capture lots of mini narratives of decline, but perhaps there'll be a useful research resource, and some interesting questions of how the material gets analysed. The inquiry seems like a useful idea, and it will do us good to examine what we mean by 'good' and 'better' and so on. If childhood was somehow 'better' in the recalled past, the value of the inquiry will be in the way it distils the truths and examines them in the wholly different social, economic and technological context. This is certainly the sense in which I think it's valuable to consider older people's descriptions of neighbourliness in their childhoods - not in terms of the accuracy of the reminiscence but in terms of the values (in this case collective values) described. And maybe we should have an equivalent exercise for old age, based on Age Concern's 'ageing well' campaign - instead of 'cherished early memories,' how about 'cherished late anticipations'? Or should there be a site where the recently bereaved put forward views on whether their older relative or friend had a 'good' old age, and what was good about it? Previously: Children's contentedness as a social indicator. Disrespecting childhoods.

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments