Tuesday, 13 November 2007

Online game about being a refugee

Againstallodds UNHCR has just launched the English language version of an online game created to increase students' awareness and knowledge about refugee situations, by putting them in the position of a refugee.

In Against all odds, the player is interrogated, hears the sound of guards' footsteps approaching, and senses the urgency in finding safety while racing against the clock.

Press release. Via Welcome to Your Library digest.

13 Nov 2007 08:54:43 | Citizenship and democracy, Cohesion and diversity, Mobility and change, Social exclusion

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Kicking up a stink So how do we define 'nuisance'? Homeowners in the vicinity of Hinton Organics near Keynsham, Somerset, say their lives are being made a misery by the stench of rotting waste from one of the UK's biggest composting recyclers. Residents successfully applied for an interim injunction which means the company will have to abide by a waste management licence designed 'to curb the smell'. I'm really not sure how you do that. I wonder if Hinton Organics will end up using chemicals to neutralise it: that would be a shame. I'd quite like to be there, but not downwind, when the High Court judge pays a visit to the site to sample the air quality. Rumours that King Abdullah of Jordan has been invited to give evidence are unconfirmed. From: Planning daily.
PREVIOUS POST
Consulting older people On the question of consultation with older people, to paraphrase Gandhi, I think it would be a good idea. I've just found out about some interesting work that Urban Buzz funded in the London Borough of Lewisham as part of the Thames gateway development, which resulted in the publication of a toolkit and guidelines for consultation with older people, prepared by The Centre for Urban and Community Research at Goldsmiths. It's a thorough and welcome document and appears to try and cover everything about the process they went through, which included field trips and mental maps of the neighbourhoods. It's important because the sense that many older people remain inexcusably excluded from consultative processes is widespread. But some of the tone leaves me a wee bit bothered. Like this: 'It is important that you present your project in a way that makes it relevant to them.' Radical stuff eh? There's more. 'Incorporate older people’s knowledge in the planning process, by consulting them if an area is going to be changed. Make use of their old photos, listen to them talk about the history about the spaces.' 'Free lunches and refreshments should be provided to offer something for their time and effort.' So long as the points get made, what am I bothered about? Well, I'm uncomfortable thinking that I live in a society where it's really necessary to make such points. It implies that there are people charged with 'consultation' for whom such things are not fundamentally obvious. But maybe the authors are right, maybe it does have to be pointed out. Many people are emerging from an embedded non-consultative authoritative culture and this is strange stuff for them. <Shudder> If I were being picky, and it's not unheard-of, I'd have added a section suggesting that people doing consultation didn't feel the need constantly to refer to one another as Dr, Professor, 'professional' or 'expert.' The entire document is suffused with a sense of the implied superior status of such people, and of councillors, over older residents. It reinforces my desire to keep pushing for a neighbourhood-mapping process designed by older people themselves.

Kevin Harris

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments