At the top of the post we’re offered a picture of the author as demure wanna-be-a-celebrity-pussy-cat-model. Stop laughing at the back there. She says she’s been a community practitioner all her life. But has not learned enough to avoid prefacing her name with ‘Dr’ on an ordinary blog post: is that likely to intimidate the peasants I wonder? I can imagine what kind of reception Dr Katharine might get on some English estates where community action is taken seriously, and Putnam’s opinion on her dissertation won’t count for anything.
In case you suspect this stuff might not be academically robust, we get an early reassurance:
‘We had no preconceived notions about what we would discover. Today, I think that fact contributes to the power of the findings.’
Oh you bet. And we’re all gagging to hear about the findings that 'for many seemed counter-intuitive—even radical at times' and how the brave author recovered from the shock of their significance.
Wait, stop rolling about on the floor, pull yourselves together, there’s more. You have to have a list of no more than nine items, even when you present findings of such astonishing galaxy-reconfiguring significance as Dr Katharine has to offer, findings which she wants you to know are ‘so groundbreaking and surprising’. Yup, the Knight Foundation and Gallup have funded this work and it will send shock waves through the community development world.
You have to have a list. No list, no credibility, those are the conditions. Dr Katharine has nine ‘key lessons’ and I bet you can’t wait to hear some of them. Oh, you can? OK.
Among the gems you might miss, I admired the following:
‘We have seen places in the findings where attachment increased even when the local economy worsened.’
‘The best ideas often come from the residents themselves, who are really the true keepers of the soul of their community.’
‘The most powerful path to change for people and places is to leverage strengths to address challenges.’
You need a PhD to really grasp the nuances, so don’t worry too much if it’s beyond you. I too feel inferior, we all do.
We’re also told that attachment is not the same as engagement. I could repeat that stunning insight; or you could read the sentence again and learn it by heart.
And then comes THE total dismiss-anyone-delivery, the fierce 95mph inswinging leg-cutting yorker (I’m using slightly obscure cricket terminology because I can’t resist, sorry) - apparently the killer academically-researched finding is that ‘the softer sides of place matter’.
I’m exhausted, I can’t take any more in. The ‘softer sides’ – why, of course, why didn’t we think of it? All these years.
At first I thought it was an April Fool spoof: the date is given as 11 April so a deliberate misprint could be part of it, albeit somewhat elaborate. If not, let's just regret that PPS's credibility has taken a knock. The article seems to be semi-sincere in that way that so many Americans have perfected and which I deeply regret I cannot match. Enjoy.
Thanks to the NANM newswire for the heads up.