« Manual for streets | Main | Respect agenda dissolves in self-parody »

The alleygaters and the permeable neighbourhood

Alley_gate Coventry City Council have been ordered 'to reconsider' a scheme to close off two public footpaths at night. The High Court ruling follows a case brought by The Ramblers Association. The council had imposed orders using lockable gates prohibiting pedestrian access to footpaths between streets throughout the night, with the intention of curbing antisocial behaviour.

This is a nice example and there could be some intellectual curtain-twitching among the secured-by-design advocates and the new urbanists opposite who let their ideas run unsupervised all round the neighbourhood. The new urbanists promote permeable neighbourhoods, so the fencers and lockers have parked their ideas right across the driveway.

Alleygating has been popular where it's worked, but you don't have to go far to hear stories where it hasn't - just one resident leaves a gate open and the place gets trashed, well maybe someone leaves a beer can, or more seriously, breaks into a house. If damage occurs, the lockers and fencers can say 'that proves you need a secure system,' so the new urbanists have to say, well how about having a few people around? And maybe some decent lighting, some promotion of informal social networks, and a bit of design to give a sense of identity. (Let's just try it shall we?)

Via Planning Resource.

Posted by Kevin Harris on June 21, 2006 at 02:17 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5157752

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The alleygaters and the permeable neighbourhood:

Comments

Let's just try it? Perhaps not...it seems that disabled people will have been left out of the loop again if we follow through with such a suggestion. Any new gates would need to be made accessible for disabled people, in accordance with Part 3 of the DDA 1995. Consider the difficulties this issue has raised in relation to rural rights of way, with stiles and gates etc. Also, as from December 2006, all local authorities will be subject to a duty to promote disability equality under the DDA 2005. Coventry CC and LAs like it, would do well to involve, as well as 'consult' on such matters.

Although, a possible knock-on benefit of such issues raising their heads might even be the active involvement of more of a neighbourhood's disabled people in new governance spaces...? Or, am I dreaming...

Posted by: Simon Blake at 3 Jul 2006 09:10:20

Simon, good point about governance and I hope you're not dreaming. But I'm surprised you don't seem to feel it desirable to promote informal social networks or visible community presence... or at least to try it?
k

Posted by: Kevin Harris at 3 Jul 2006 09:24:53

Post a comment